Your justifications for this were completely correct.
Suddenly – short after your 18th birthday – you started to praise our system, the so called democracy – which isn’t one (see below), thus being the symptom, the center and the main reason of what goes wrong and continues to go wrong.
Ooooops … this can’t be my High-IQ-Aspie-(me too)-Hero Greta … I thought.
The Ethicracy’s supporter’s group (some of them [and me] are near to bankruptcy because of the costs now) sent me to Stockholm, to meet you personally, to give you this letter and to talk some words about it with you.
I’ve got COPD (sw. „kronisk obstruktiv lungsjukdom“ = „KOL“, result of smoking), beginning last Status, thus being a real protagonist and image of the sins of the burning old world. Every heavy respiratory distress attack feels like just dying (like the upcoming nature catastrophes). I’ve been in dying pain around a third of the time, when I waited and even slept in the rented car.
Those days were a real hell for me, I never have frozen so much and so long in my life.
I guess, those days have cut the rest of my life by a quarter of a year and I estimate having a maximum of half a year to three quarters of a year left now.
But I’m the only person, which is able to answer your assumed questions about the letter / the Ethicracy completely, so I had to drink this goblin.
I already knew, that you don’t live in Hallmans Gata 5 any longer, and your new apartment address is secret, but I simply wanted to give the letter (and a small present from one of our group members) to your mother, so that it can’t be withheld from you … and to transport the message, that there is a dying man, whose last wish is [and remains] to exchange a few consoling direct words with his hero.
There wasn’t a bell and I didn’t want to behave like a house intruding stalker … but I got contact to a neighbour at the pass between No.5 and No.7. She seemed nice and sympathic and seemed to understand my concern. She told me about the threats and harassment that you and your family are exposed to – which she did not need to do because I could long ago imagine it. She promised to inform your mother and to call back. A day later she came back and told me again the assumed … that your mother doesn’t want contact. When I offered her just the letter to give it to your mother, she made a defensive gesture, as if the letter was the work of the devil. I couldn’t understand this at that moment. Contrary to her promise to try again to soften your mother and to report back, she did not call back afterwards.
Together with several other weird events this week it leads me to the suspect – bordering on certainty – that there is massive blackmail and strict withholding of information at play. The whole thing simply doesn’t fit, if not assuming this.
At any rate, not even the only and last personal wish of a dying man helped to meet you.
I can imagine two possible changes leading to your new narrative.
1. You (me too) fear the fascists, the covidiots, the conspiracy tellers, the … psychopathic ones (see below) – you know who I mean …
Because you don’t know, how else to fight them, you say „Democracy is the best we have.“
This is nearly true, if you stay aware that „democracy“ is the wrong word.
Completely true the statement would have been, if you would have said: „Our system is the best we have.“
Yes, it’s much better than dictatorships and oligarchies and feudalism and …
But by your statement you fixed the system and cut the path into a lifeworthy future mentally off.
In fact you should have said: „The law to behave democratic is the best law we have.“
This would have been completely true and future oriented.
2. The system (resp. one or several of it’s protagonists) told you something like:
„You are of legal age now, the time of puppy protection is over. From now on you are not allowed to say anything against the system any longer, otherwise we can no longer protect your family and you.“
Please note the order: „your family and you“.
And note the obvious lie: „… we can no longer …“.
This would be the precise style of the system, as I have experienced and watched several times in my life … and which is logical in the macchiavellistic current world’s system structure. Simple and „natural“, usual and „normal“, not a conspiracy theory – I know those guys well (several times in my life I heard from company a/o political psychopaths during a relaxed dinner talk opinions like that they would appreciate humanity being reduced by 90%, they themselves living in climatized habitats, protected by police and military).
And in this case everything fits to each other, also to my hell week in Stockholm.
Around 15 years ago I identified a real life mafia recruiting circle in the virtual world „Second Life“ (in its high time, when even Mercedes and IBM had virtual branches there), based on the same type and level of information/hints – my American native friends who played there too (some of them were able to verify my perception in real life) name(d) me „Owl Eyes“ – I know what I’m saying.
I guess now, you are a victim of both aspects stated above.
And explosive educational information is kept away from you in advance.
Now continuing with the original letter, hoping that it reaches you soon nevertheless …
I had designed the Ethicracy already since around one decade, rooted a half century ago, and after your speech in Katowice there were only some checks and finishings necessary during the following year. We checked it over and over, by much feedback and many critics from others, and since nearly one year no appreciable problems could be found any longer, which I couldn’t solve integrated and consistently in some minutes to hours. And no gaps could be found as well. I tried to bring it into a typical scientific form, but – as a friend said – it would have lasted 2-3 years with the result of an interdisciplinary postdoctoral lecture qualification of around 1200 pages with hundreds of diagrams and >500 individually commented links … lasting too long to give climate rescue a chance. So I am assembling the essentials to this website (draft) for your asperger’s (→ me too) eyes – friends help(ed) me to explain some aspects to the public, more generally understandable also for non-autists – my own first try for a start page was here.
This is compliant with the primordial meaning of this word during the development of the psychiatry – all classic and newer, often changed diagnosis criteria for psychopathy are united by one (mostly undisclosed, implicit) attribute, namely the lack of empathy: unscrupulousness, greed, fearlessness, indolence, risk willingness, trickyness/falseness, cruelty, growth/mightyness gain, exploitation, … btw, reptiles grow their whole life long, where mammals maturate, biologically necessary as well.
For me and the Ethicracy ethics is the cognitive fulfillment of empathy, being aware of our mammalian existence.
As a being capable of ethics, the human being is obligedto keep the harm of it’s fellow beings as low as possibleand to consider this preventively
Empathy can be trained. The cognitum is a brilliant tool for inner self-energizing, feedback-loop. The neuroplasticity of the brain – especially the mammalian brain – allows it. This is a long term change.
Psychopaths are more willing to approach and exceed limits, crossing empathic/legal borders, fearless, risky, unscroupulous, ready to lie and manipulate.
I call this the psychopathic stimulus-/ incentive-/ intention-/concretion-/ realization-/ compression-/ escalation-…-force vector – in general this force vector is stronger/more efficient than the same-graded empathic one, the vector sum is yet significantly psychopathic.
In average the females are a bit more empathic/ethical, because they – caring for the children – need more empathy and experience it deeper, have to train it – while the males are more often called to protect, to fight against outer threats and/or to hunt for food, where empathy hinders, psychopathy helps.
If their empathy is little trained, they dominate the community by their more reptile-like unscrupulous aggression, the consquence is rather a patriarchy. If their empathy is well-trained, they let it dominate their measures and behavior, the consequence is rather a matriarchy. Those two possible paths can be well-observed comparing chimpanzees and bonobos. I guess, humans are between them by nature, but of course our strong cognitum gives us the ability to decide … to train or not to train empathy. Even humans, who are relative psychopathic by their base level, can behave careful by the cognitive measure of fairness, conscious/intellectual value setting, think about the ethical categorical imperative again. And think about the fact, that also females can be reptilian brain dominated – extreme example: at the chimpanzees sometimes females kill concurrent females and/or their children. [What cars are for modern males, that’s fashion for modern females – somehow characteristical, that the CO2-/harm-production of both is of equal dimensions.] But – as I said before – in generally there is a statistically clear overhang of empathy in females.
And everything works without any money – the stimulus to work for the community is – beside the potential empathic/ethical responsibility – the harm compensating higher material (food, clothing, rooming, decoration) and mental (honor, trust) comfort.
This is the origin of the capitalistic structure, the psychopathic setting the course (thus the fulcrum to switch into the Ethicracy now), where the course is until now focussed at material having and growing instead of executive being and maturing – object versus process, capital/might versus living/loving, exploitation versus balancing, reptile versus mammal.
The middle ages were the beginning of the mercantile- and financial-capitalistic economy and it’s psychopathic businessmen-class.
This is the switching of the base force vector and can be done by/during/with a constituent assembly.
[Btw, the structure of my discussions with „democrats“ today is identical with the structure of my discussions with fanatic sectarian christians in my youth] And now most people themselves say, there is no better system known than this old one.
We can get it, if we really wish to, a concerted action during March/April by many scientists and other reputable people – four weeks should be enough for the preparation of the most important, if we treat it as a crisis with priority 1. There are no practical constraints other than by the forces of nature laws. The Ethicracy is amazingly simple, because there are no Hegelian dodges necessary, no cover-ups of the evil – straight and unenstranged, completely „Glasnost“ and natural, nature’s laws based. The Ethical Categorical Imperative implies everything else to be done consistently with the mammal existence:
harm prevention, compensation and reduction.
The primary and strongest force ever and everywhere, the force of life itself
The vector of this force points to Empathy-Ethics
!! The Children order all human beings to do their best possible !!
to prevent, compensate and reduce harm,
to minimize overall harm for each individual,
for the community and nature in its entirety,
therefor to tame and educate each to empathy
! This generates the Ethical Categorical Imperative !
The preamble of the constitution of the Ethicracy
to keep the harm of it’s fellow beings as low as possible
and to consider this preventively
Matters to leave behind
- Violent enstrangement forces in general
- Enstranged Ownership — violent creation + further violence potential
(including territories and material growth rivalry)
- Money — enstranged/violent creation + further harm/violence creation potential
(material-valuing, transferrable, cumulatable, mightyness producing)
- Government — steady harm/violence creation potential
(including forces by hegelian measures, parties and/or parlamentarians)
(including administrational regionalizing other than by geography/language/culture)
- Hegelian Law System — not preventing, not compensating and not reducing harm
(tolerating/respecting/strengthening psychopathy, punishment = harm production)
- equal ranking of psychical und physical harm
- unconditional „cost“-free wellcare safety for all people, subsidiarity principle with worldwide deficit compensation
- freedom from enstranged borders, dominion, mightyness- and profit-attempts, labour- and growth-forces.
- taming, harm-compensating, preventive law including safeguarding
- ethical (of course now direct/true) democratic legislative
- respect for and execution of the laws of nature
- benevolent stewardship (administration) by the community
(actually superfluous, results from everything else, but is the most prominent symptom in everyday life, therefor explicitly mentioned here)
Structures to be created
- community stewardship
- empathic-ethical legal system
preventing, taming, victim-harm compensating by the community,
offender-victim harm-compensating, educating – thus preventing in turn
- well care for each human being and for all other living beings depending on human forces
- harm compensation medium = „Comp“ (compensation potential) – Unit: „Com(s)“ – Symbol: Ω (prelim.)
- characteristic: energy-/harm-based – no „costs“ for „matter“.
- characteristic: personal and/or life space harm compensating, limited personal charge
limit-overflow and/or non-use of weekly potential goes to seniority-comfort-keeping (conserving-economizing)
(⇒ community controlled modulation of comp mappings)
- function: personal harm compensation/ prevention/ reduction, decoupled, no dependency forces
- function: demand for/ offer of work ⇒ incentive by distress/harm compensation offer
(⇒ work harm compensation on the job)
- function: life space harm prevention, incentive/disincentive
- people’s [direct, delegatable] democracy – „Communitive“ – legislative for the community context
- harm prevention by taming psychopathy by voting weighted by personal ethical maturity factor
incentive to develop/train/learn empathy-ethics
- public ethics council (parliament) consisting of the most weighty delegates
discourse and veto potential in all concerns
- harm prevention by taming psychopathy by voting weighted by personal ethical maturity factor
- scientist’s [direct, delegatable] democracy: „Scientive“ – legislative for the life space / nature context
- scientists-internal: same voting technique, but weighted by personal competence factor
(expresses the dictate of nature’s laws) – competence factor ≈ academic grade/reputation, topic-specific
- scientists-internal public ethics council (parliament) consisting of the most ethically-weighty delegates
discourse and veto potential – decisions of the Scientive can be additionally vetoed by the people’s ethics council
- scientists-internal: same voting technique, but weighted by personal competence factor
- care for best possible freedom from anxiousness concerning
- all/every other human being(s) ⇒ recognition of the harm creation potential of every community member
- the future ⇒ climate triple rescue (physical, ecological, social)
according to mammalian species‘ needs, dependency (of nature’s laws) based
⇒ „obligation“ of the ethical categorical imperative (circle closed)
There is not any longer enough time to explain (or translate) the twigs and leafs fully (horrible for my perfectionism) – please look at the (below) linked pages, try to use the language setting button „English“ (sadly often the pages are not yet translated) and use translator, if necessary. Everything else (twigs and leafs) can be derived logically and unique from the „base engine“ I showed above, and I am always ready to answer any of your possible questions.
The wellcare economy gives us a perfect base of being secure in our needs, with no „costs“, with a comfort for everyone acceptable, never dependent on anyone else or one self’s behaviour – the extras and the climate-relevant parameters are easily controllable, equitable/fair. I was able to solve every detail problem (which arose by critics and examples) quickly, fine-tuned, refinable, builtin-optimizable, fault-tolerant – this is also valid for the voting-system. Even the birth-control problem can be solved easily – in the current system it’s unethical to offer an incentive for birth reduction, because people may feel forced to sell their child-producing ability for survival, never a problem in the Ethicracy (will work like the fine-tuned smoothe reduction of the incidence-value of Covid in Germany), using „personal genetic extinction harm compensation“ as incentive.
If thinking about wellcare-/ harm-compensation- and/or incentive-/disincentive-problems, always keep in mind the „non-value„-, „non-transfer„-/“non-coupling„, „non-blackmailability„-, „non-inflationaryness„- and „non-exploitation„-characteristic of the comp.
I found the most impressive example in „second-hand“-transfer – the contributor gets a compensation, and the receiver gets a compensation as well, if he replaces a budgeted possible new piece by a used one … and needs only few coms (possibly even less than the contributor gets), if he „buys“ it as an extra. This is completely impossible in the old system structure, but easy with the comp, which doesn’t take away any comp from any other beings. Bargain between persons is also always possible, but competary always single-person-relating modulated by the community, according to charge-(„richness“)-limitations.
And I already thought about the handling of the media in respect of the constituent assembly.
Also the bootstrap of the new system is detailed thought about, realistic, vital.
Also the intermediate transitional regulations regarding the legacy system environment (economy/money) – while other countries have not yet joined – are taken into account, but need yet to be discussed with e.g. Maja Göpel.
There are enough resources, human working power and technical knowledge to get even the necessary drawdown initiated and built up afterwards.
And I already know how to proceed to come to the Constituent Assembly in the remaining 4-5 weeks.
– you are the key to it, you are the only person in the world, who can attain it, we just simply need to talk about it.
Sorry to be the summoner of this additional burden on your shoulders – but you can achieve the world’s rescue – I’m sure.
I’m only the completor, the tool builder, the old one with experience and longtime learning, but yet able to look into a better new world.
You are and gave me the spirit, please do the last step and prioritize it for all using your reputation.
Simply open the attention-, recommendation- and timepressure-doors/-hurdles – let’s talk about it …
If not you (and we together) right now … who else and when else …
Everybody, who stands against the Ethicracy, shows his psychopathy
- my background
- first minimized „engine“ reasoning, definition, construction, explanation, .ppt-download (outdated but yet valuable)
- brain and mental forces … want it to be ratified by e.g. Alina Buyx, chairwoman of the current „ethics council“ in Germany and medicine woman
- power/force base … want it to be ratified by e.g. Buyx too, as well as the basic ethics-definition and the Hegel-Kant-switch
- first steps of constitution … needs to be discussed quickly, me with meta-law-experts, also about „constituent assembly“ and „legal system“
- comp-system and wellcare-economy, many details … needs to be discussed and checked quickly, me with e.g. Maja Göpel
- vote-weighting, voting system, „separation of powers“, „legal system“ … want it to be checked/ratified quickly on a Kant-base
- climate crisis … needs to integrate physicist’s views (all models and estimations) and economy parameters, risk-prioritization against the usual, clearly measurable values and simple probabilities – enlightenment needs for most (!hegelian!) academics, concerning responsibilities in risk-management